Who are the artists (both contemporary and historical) that you can truly say have been a significant influence on your personal work?
Describe why for each artist.
I would have to say that Kandinsky would be my all time inspirational artist. I have seen many exhibitions of his work, just recently in Munich, I have seen why he is considered to be the founder of abstract art...in fact he was the first to have ever done an abstract.......
As an abstract artist, are you drawn to others’ abstract pieces or more realistic artwork? Do you think this decision is a conscious or subconscious decision?
Which colors do you find yourself using the most often and is there any particular reason?
I love ochre, alarzin crimson, and Vermillion Red......Orange Chrome.....It is the interaction of these colours that interest me. Red of course expresses passion....
When recognizable figures or objects emerge in your work, however rare this may be, do you automatically paint them over or do you take time to think about the item’s overall effect before making a decision?
I have found that most viewers always attempt to find something recognizable in a piece of work. This is how we are as humans...we are driven by the need to put meaning to things. I often hear people making comments as Oh, I see a ...........or that looks like a............Abstract art i think needs to be exactly what it is...Abstract......it makes people think more and dig deeper into a piece of work to find its abstract meaning. Rarely do I like to leave something that is recognizable in a piece of work. it is the colour and shape that interests me and how the colour interacts.
Do you use other items other than brushes, such as palette knives, to create texture in your work? Do you prefer visual or actual texture and why?
I mostly use palette knifes to obtain highly textured effects. I apply thick oil to obtain actual texture. The texture enhances emotion, in my belief, and gives depth and sometimes more meaning to a piece of work.
How much do you believe in the idea of pre-planning a canvas and how much are you willing to allow that idea to change as the painting progresses to a finished piece?
I do not entertain this belief of pre-planning a piece of work. Abstract art I believe should be spontaneous, whatever comes out, comes out. Lyrical abstractions are done in this way. As a work progresses it has to be for me something that is appealing and right. I usually know when it is right....There are times when I have been completely dissatisfied with a work and change it completely or sometimes a bit. but the finished result must make a statement, it must move something inside the viewer. Abstract possibilities are endless and after each mark is made on the substrate, I have to make a decision of what comes next. In realism, one knows where the painting will end up. This is the part of my work that is the most thrilling to me...What happens next? Lyrical abstractions requires the viewer to contemplate, study and ask themselves "what am I feeling"? I enjoy being a part of the interactive experience with the person viewing a piece of my work.
How important is the title in your work? Do they start out in the original phases of painting or are the “final piece to the puzzle” as the finishing touch?
Yes, I do believe the title is essential. What it essentially does and especially for lyrical abstract work, it assists in giving the viewer some sense of meaning. I enjoy listening to music when I paint, and at times I may chose a lyric from a song or title of a song as the painting's title. I love poetry as well and may chose a line from a poem, or i just play around with words to come up with something that is catchy. Sometimes these modes of giving a title can abstract in themselves. Just to give a few examples, Secret Melt.2010 it is about a love affair, or Her Shadow Still Lingers Here, a work inspired by my feelings when I remembered my mother's death. or The Night Is My Companion. a feeling of despair.
Is a piece of work ever truly finished? If so, why?
Someone once said, a finished painting is a dead painting....I suppose this is true in some respects. an abstract painter is always expressing themselves on canvas and the process of art is continous
Art must be, somehow, essential for life. Art is part of the human spirit.....
In your personal studio, how do you work? Do you prefer silence or background noise?
I approach a blank canvas as if I was a matador confronting a bull, it is frightening for me, the canvas is my palette. I squeeze oil paint onto the canvas and usually this is where some method comes into it. I place the colours that I have chosen next to one another and start working the oil, attempting to pull out the essence of the colour by working it over and over again....As mentioned earlier I prefer to paint with music, but at times I chose to get lost in silence a silence that can be heard, and it is just the canvas and me with no distractions...It all depends on my state of mind I suppose.
Do you work on more than one piece of work at a time?
Yes, if it is a series I am doing, I do work with more than one canvas at a time. If I am not satisfied and beginning to feel frustrated I will leave it and start a new painting and then eventually come back to it to finish it.
How important is size to your work? In general, how much importance do you think size has on abstract work? Do you believe that abstract work is meant to “swallow the viewer” by its size or instead be small enough to “look for something more”?
Size I believe does play a significant role in a piece of work but I rarely use large canvasses, just for practical reasons. I like doing small pieces, a small piece can say alot more....my largest canvass has only been 120 x 100cm...which is not huge but I have enjoyed doing large canvasses. i believe the size does have to represent the essence of what the abstract work is meant to show or evoke.
Describe your process in depth from initial “concept” to “finished” piece.
Are your paintings in any way “spiritually significant?” This does not necessarily have to do with any religious belief, but instead, more of an emotional or inner connection that an artist or a viewer has with the work.
Yes, I do believe my work is in some way spiritually significant especially when I start to think of how I have become the person who I am, I have evolved and developed into someone who is compassionate about life and who feels that everything started from somewhere. I do believe that whoever put us here must also take us away and that the gift of painting must have been given by someone. there is something spiritual about the connection that we have with nature, with our fellow human being. We are all somehow interconnected....there is energy in everything living thing on this planet and it must have come from somewhere. So this is the spirtual relationship......
What do you want the individual viewer to take away from a finished piece displayed in a gallery setting?
I want to viewer to be moved emotionally by a finished piece whether they go away with a positive or negative opinion does not really matter to me. I want the viewer to say, i love your work, I love them to say, what are u trying to say here, i want them to say, I don't get it. I enjoy the piece of explaining what is happening in the work. Or I will just say to them, it is what it is and nothing else.
Are there any personal experiences that feature prominently in the cause of a piece or work? In other words, are there any paintings you have made that are a direct response, emotional or otherwise, to particular situations in your own life?
I believe I have already answered this in the beginning of my writing, my work has evolved, it is based on my cultural and personal experiences in life, art is one of the ways in which we say i am alive and my life has meaning.
Is your work made completely from your mind as a logical and physical exploration of paint or a more emotional freedom of the paint? For reference, think Piet Mondrian vs. Jackson Pollock. Explain the circumstances for either or each.
Emotional freedom I would say. I can do whatever I wish with my painting, I have complete control of what it is I am doing so I suppose there is some logic to it.
Do large changes in the canvas (painting over one whole, large section in a different color) or smaller changes (a tiny space of detailed texture) mean more to you or do both have an equal place in your explorations? Which one tends to be more of a “spur of the moment decision”?
Spur of the moment decision, a small change might mean just getting rid of a line or colour that just does not fit into the work. At times I have found that just eliminating something small from the work can make the painting "finished". when this occurs, I know that the work has been progressing the way I wanted it to and all it really needed was a very small change to it. And yes, I have made radical changes to a piece because the compostion was just not working for me so I jump back into the work........and get frightened again....